It’s hard to  understand why America thinks they are entitled to good press.   Public reputation may well help put food on the table and the idea of using it as a food weapon be useful to the people in our culture but the idea Herbert Agar espoused that political systems do sometimes have to compromise to put food on everyone’s table shouldn’t just get a pass to allow perfectly well fed people to use food supply lines to starve dissent.  Joel Caplan is a perfect person for Obama and Biden to promote in working the pledge of Pittsburgh that “there is no such thing as objective reality.”  His mind was carefully loaded with spin control bids for a piece of the action, “all very interesting,” he would pout, “but what of this is real and what is fancy?”  Sort of like that old Moody Blues soliloquy.  Running a JDL trophy kill network for the Israel Within Caplan arises in this text with new news about somewhat older discoveries, noting here their admission to having created battlefield cloaking devices, today’s little revelation in the news.

         For decades my occupation as unpaid freelance has been dominated by incomprehension not about Obama whose opportunism rivals no man, but that Kennedy assassin researchers would lie for Gail Burstyn.  Many of these men are like the Dunedain, scorned nobodies to all but those who know their hard work.  Why would they stand for arguments they at least should know by now were leading to murders of more family members in free smacks?  I do know how they song and danced it.   They puff up in grimace that Jim Garrison, too, would recognize their magnificent savvy.

         Garrison, like Ryland, my father, and Martha Gellhorn, one of my heroes, was struck dumb with disbelief over the concentration camps in Europe when the victorious allies found the remains of Germany’s doings and this made them caustic and lenient towards Israel but how lenient can you get?  Letting them steal our face as their mask in launching a genocidal revenge?  Standing for that?  Is that what Amy Globalczar means when she says she knows you?   I think the shaman she really knows is Tony Levin.

       Tony Levin believes in bio-terror, using it for crime.  He storms around bellowing that virginity proves rape and that Lennon would bless the murder of Saoirse (that I believe).  He rages that one size fits all because he doesn’t care who he hurts and doesn’t believe in the pain of others.  The whole of his macabre musical masturbation is greater than the sum of the planet.

        This illusion machine, which admits that’s what they are, own organizations like The Nation who angle with informed and semi-accurate editorials to command the idea that they have more realistic information but when it comes to Gail Burstyn and the truth about what was done to me, they live by the doctrine of Death Before Honor.  This is why it means nothing to them to stalk a victim of serial torture in a snuff film while Gail Burstyn’s coterie.